<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bruce van der Kooij &#187; collaborative software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.parsed.nl/tag/collaborative-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.parsed.nl</link>
	<description>Unfinished business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The state of collaborative software</title>
		<link>http://blog.parsed.nl/2009/12/24/the-state-of-collaborative-software/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-state-of-collaborative-software</link>
		<comments>http://blog.parsed.nl/2009/12/24/the-state-of-collaborative-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bruce van der Kooij</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parsed.nl/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Collaborative software and its uses is one of the areas I&#8217;m personally quite interested in. Have you heard of real-time collaborative editors? I&#8217;ve experimented with real-time collaborative text editors going back to at least 2006 (starting with MoonEdit). This was precisely the reason I was not impressed by Google Doc&#8217;s initial concurrent editing functionality, even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collaborative software and its uses is one of the areas I&#8217;m personally quite interested in. Have you heard of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_real-time_editor">real-time collaborative editors</a>?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve experimented with real-time collaborative text editors going back to at least 2006 (starting with MoonEdit). This was precisely the reason I was not impressed by Google Doc&#8217;s initial concurrent editing functionality, even though it seemed the world was going nuts about it (not sure what the current state of it is).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used <a href="http://gobby.0x539.de/trac/" target="_blank">Gobby</a> for collaborating on plain text documents (content without design). Gobby is an <a href="http://www.opensource.org/" target="_blank">open source</a> desktop collaborative editor and runs on Linux, Mac OS X and Windows, If you want to try it out simply install it then click &#8220;Join session&#8221; in the toolbar and as a Host fill in &#8220;gobby.0&#215;539.de&#8221; (without quotes).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also <a href="http://etherpad.com/" target="_blank">EtherPad</a>, launched in November of 2008, which seems to be the best (both in terms of user experience and depth of functionality) online real-time collaborative text editor currently out there. The biggest difference between EtherPad and Gobby is that the former is a web application, so you don&#8217;t have to install anything to try it out (you don&#8217;t even have to sign-up).</p>
<p>The company behind EtherPad (<a href="http://appjet.com/" target="_blank">AppJet</a>) has recently been acquired by Google, which led to <a href="http://code.google.com/p/etherpad/">open sourcing of EtherPad itself</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://etherpad.com/UmWdFRA2cd" target="_blank">I&#8217;ve created a pad that you can use the try out EtherPad</a> (and so I can check up on if anybody tried it out ;-).</p>
<p>If you want to collaborate on more formal documents you might be interested in <a href="http://msevior.livejournal.com/24298.html" target="_blank">Abiword&#8217;s real-time collaborative editing functionality</a> (video).</p>
<p>For me the biggest disappointment in this area so far has been Google&#8217;s Wave implementation. I originally had high hopes, but, and I&#8217;m sorry to have to say it, for me right now it&#8217;s completely unusable for both communication (chat) and any form of collaboration. I&#8217;m keeping my fingers crossed that the situation will improve and wish them the best. <a href="http://etherpad.com/ep/blog/posts/google-wave-joins-etherpad" target="_blank">Also see the comments from the EtherPad team on Google Wave</a>.</p>
<p>On a side note. Wouldn&#8217;t it be totally awesome if you could simply plug-and-play real-time collaboration functionality in for example <a href="http://www.geany.org/">Geany</a>, the basis is certainly there in the form of libifinity from Gobby though still a lot of work still needs to be done (undo/redo functionality being the major lacking feature).</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.parsed.nl/2009/12/24/the-state-of-collaborative-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

